• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Search Projects
  • Log in

USDA Regional IPM Centers

Grants to support Integrated Pest Management
  • Grants Home
  • Project Reports
    • Search Projects
    • Search Project Coordinators
  • About The IPM Centers

Project Overview

NC21-012
Project Type: IPM Centers Grant
Funds awarded in 2021: $48,098.00
Grant Recipient: Purdue University
Region: North Central
State: Indiana
Cooperating States: none
Project Coordinator:
Elizabeth Long
Email
Purdue University

Exploring linkages between IPM practices, social networks, and success of carrot weevil management in the Great Lakes & Mid-Atlantic Regions of the US

Reports

Commodities

  • Additional Plants: herbs
  • Ecosystem: Ecosystem
  • Human Health: workers, residents, applicators
  • Vegetables: carrots, celery, other

Target Pests

No target pests identified (required to submit report)

For projects that don't address specific target pest, click this button.

Practices

  • Pest Management: cultural control, decision support system, mechanical control, monitoring/scouting, pesticide application timing, pesticide resistance management
  • Crop Production: cropping systems
  • Production Systems: agroecosystems

Proposal abstract:

This 1-year critical issues grant proposal focuses on a devastating crop specialist, the carrot weevil (Listronotus oregonensis), which threatens carrots, parsley, and celery in key production regions of North America. The carrot weevil (hereafter, CW) is a small snout beetle whose larvae feed on the stalk, crown, and roots of plants, causing severe injury and plant death. Progress towards management of this pest remains sporadic at best, and as a result, there is heavy reliance on insecticides, which are ineffective and routinely applied blindly. Key constraints to improving CW management are 1) lack of broader knowledge of growers’ IPM practices and knowledge networks across regions where focal crops are grown, and 2) lack of research-based information on the relative costs and benefits of IPM strategies for CW at the commercial field scale.

We propose an interdisciplinary approach to identify social and biological factors that influence the efficacy of CW management tactics across affected states in the Great Lakes and mid-Atlantic regions of the U. S. Our specific objectives are to 1A) develop and disseminate a survey instrument to compile regional knowledge and adoption of IPM practices against vegetable insect pests, particularly CW, 1B) assess the importance of knowledge networks in implementation of IPM practices against vegetable pests, particularly CW, and 2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of CW management strategies in conventional versus delayed planting scenarios, using fresh parsley as a model system. Our goal is to identify key management-based factors that influence the efficacy of carrot weevil IPM tactics, so we can synthesize and develop modern management solutions. Although manipulative aspects of this proposal are focused in Ohio, this project represents the first regional effort to address critical CW knowledge gaps and develop future steps towards successful CW management across affected regions. Our proposal directly responds to multiple desired outcomes identified by the North Central Integrated Pest Management Center’s Critical Issues Grant Program, including: a) improved understanding of current IPM issues across disciplines, crops and states, b) increased collaboration among diverse scientific and extension communities in addressing IPM challenges/priorities, and c) improved information exchange and knowledge sharing.

Project objectives from proposal:

1A. Develop and disseminate a survey instrument to compile regional knowledge and adoption of IPM practices against vegetable insect pests, particularly CW.

1B. Assess the importance of knowledge networks in implementation of IPM practices against vegetable pests, particularly CW.

2. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of CW management strategies in conventional versus delayed planting scenarios, using fresh parsley as a model system.

 

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Regional IPM Centers.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

USDA Regional IPM Centers USDA

This site is produced and managed by the Regional IPM Centers and is based on code developed by SARE. The Regional IPM Centers are supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture through agreement 2018-70006-28884. Nondiscrimination Policy. Privacy Policy.

USDA Regional IPM Centers © 2026
Help | Contact us