• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Search Projects
  • Log in

USDA Regional IPM Centers

Grants to support Integrated Pest Management
  • Grants Home
  • Project Reports
    • Search Projects
    • Search Project Coordinators
  • About The IPM Centers

Project Overview

S21-001
Project Type: IPM Centers Grant
Funds awarded in 2021: $29,993.00
Grant Recipient: Texas A&M University
Region: Southern
State: Texas
Cooperating States: none
Project Coordinator:
Dr. Raul Medina
Email
Texas A&M AgriLife Research

The Role of Honeydew in Mediating Sugarcane Aphid Interactions with Natural Enemies

Reports

Commodities

  • Agronomic: sorghum (milo), sorghum (sweet)

Target Pests

  • Target Pests: aphids

Practices

  • Pest Management: behavioral control, biological control
  • Production Systems: agroecosystems

Proposal abstract:

Problem: A new sorghum pest, the sugarcane aphid (SCA), was first reported on sorghum in Beaumont, Texas during the summer of 2013. Since then, SCA has spread from Florida to California and it is now a serious problem for US sorghum. Growers in states affected by SCA have experienced yield reductions ranging from 20 to 100%. In the southern US, SCA feeds predominantly on grain sorghum and Johnson grass. In Johnson grass its susceptibility to predators and parasitoids is significantly lower than on sorghum. This is important because SCA in the southern US overwinters in Johnson grass, where it builds up large populations by the time sorghum is planted, spilling over into sorghum where it reaches population numbers that require insecticide sprays. Increasing SCA vulnerability to its natural enemies in Johnson grass can delay SCA population build up in sorghum, reducing the number of insecticide applications needed against this aphid.

Approach: The generalist parasitoid wasps Aphelinus nigritus and Lysiphlebus testaceipes are the two most common parasitoids of SCA in the US and are currently being considered as potential biological control agents. These wasps are known to feed on honeydew and use honeydew-associated cues to help locate potential hosts. Sugar, amino acid and fumaric acid concentration in honeydew varies significantly between SCA feeding grain sorghum and Johnson grass. Bacterial symbionts have been shown to alter honeydew nutritional quality and/or attractiveness for natural enemies in other aphid species.  Preliminary data from our laboratory, shows significant differences in microbiota composition between honeydew from sorghum and Johnson grass SCA. This proposal characterizes changes in honeydew bacterial communities and assesses whether chemical and microbial composition covary on Johnson grass and sorghum as well as explores the influence of honeydew bacterial composition in attracting natural enemies. 

Anticipated impact: Data generated by this project will inform future studies examining artificial manipulation of SCA honeydew aimed to increase SCA vulnerability to its natural enemies. Our long-term goal is to use this information to design future management practices aimed to increase the vulnerability of SCA to its parasitoids in Johnson grass so that fewer SCA move to sorghum fields.

Project objectives from proposal:

Outputs:

1- Characterize variation in bacterial microbiota of SCA honeydew when feeding on Johnson grass and grain sorghum

2- Assess attractiveness of parasitoids to SCA honeydew from aphids feeding on Johnson grass and grain sorghum

Outcomes:

1-Determine if the bacterial microbiota of SCA honeydew differs between aphids feeding on Johnson grass and sorghum 

2-Determine whether host plant mediated differences in SCA honeydew influence parasitoid attraction

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Regional IPM Centers.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

USDA Regional IPM Centers USDA

This site is produced and managed by the Regional IPM Centers and is based on code developed by SARE. The Regional IPM Centers are supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture through agreement 2018-70006-28884. Nondiscrimination Policy. Privacy Policy.

USDA Regional IPM Centers © 2026
Help | Contact us