• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Search Projects
  • Log in

USDA Regional IPM Centers

Grants to support Integrated Pest Management
  • Grants Home
  • Project Reports
    • Search Projects
    • Search Project Coordinators
  • About The IPM Centers

Project Overview

S22-036
Project Type: IPM Centers Grant
Funds awarded in 2022: $30,000.00
Grant Recipient: Auburn University
Region: Southern
State: Alabama
Cooperating States: Alabama
Project Coordinator:
David Held
Email
Auburn University

Conservation Biological Control of Crapemyrtle Bark Scale through Education and Demonstration

Reports

Commodities

  • Additional Plants: ornamentals, trees

Target Pests

  • Target Pests: scale

Practices

  • Pest Management: behavioral control, biological control, biorational pesticides, pesticides

Proposal abstract:

Crapemyrtle bark scale (CMBS), is an invasive scale insect first discovered in 2004 in an urban landscape near McKinney Texas. Since then, CMBS has expanded into 12 more states.  In Alabama, CMBS is well established in southern and northern counties and is now detected in multiple locations in the metro Birmingham and Huntsville areas. Feeding by CMBS reduces the aesthetic value of crapemyrtle, decreasing its bloom size and vigor, causing branch dieback, and producing honeydew which leads to trunks and branches darkened with sooty mold. As with most new pests, there is often a lag between pest arrival and the availability of Extension resources. With urban tree problems, often the persons making treatment or site decisions are not being reached by Extension or IPM programs. Soil or trunk applied neonicotinoid insecticides are widely used for control of CMBS.  Soil and trunk application techniques can decrease the potential pesticide exposure to humans relative to insecticides applied as foliar sprays. These application techniques also do not place fresh residues on the foliage which can reduce exposures to natural enemies. The current Extension recommendation for CMBS is to treat infested trees annually, and all other crapemyrtle trees in a landscape even if only one tree in the landscape is infested. Dinotefuran and imidacloprid are the two systemic neonicotinoids being widely used for CMBS management. Crapemyrtle produces an abundance of flowers that are nectarless but produce large amounts of reward pollen. The Held lab recently reported that dinotefuran and imidacloprid, when applied as soil drenches at the rates labeled for CMBS control, will translocate into crapemyrtle pollen and are present at levels that would provide contact and oral toxicity to bees and other pollen-feeding insects. The risks to non-target insects are greatest for the first flowering and year after application. Fortunately, foliar applications of limonene can reduce CMBS populations by 69.5% in 4 wk relative to non-treated control when applied at crawler hatch.  Recruitment of lady beetles to trees can be enhanced by hanging yellow panels in infested trees. Also, yellow panels hung in the canopy of infested trees can reduce CMBS populations by 44% in 2 months relative to trees with no panels. The proposed Capstone project will combine the outcomes of our recent research with visual attractants and low risk alternative controls for management of CMBS in urban landscapes. Our goal is to produce an innovative and actionable alternative to systemic insecticides for CMBS management. The objectives have research demonstration and Extension components. The Extension objective will address the accurate diagnosis of CMBS and associated natural enemies through in-person meetings and products (bookmarks and training modules), and gauge adoption of these alternative practices. The research demonstration will deploy panels, limonene treatments, or both on trees in the urban landscape. The demonstration and comparison to the current standards are critical to pieces of data to foster adoption especially for arborists and landscape managers whose professional reputations are at stake when promoting alternative controls. This will have the short- and long-term effects of reducing preventive and indiscriminate use of neonicotinoid insecticides in urban landscapes for CMBS management.

Project objectives from proposal:

Planned Outputs
What you plan on doing or making

Anticipated Outcomes
What changes are expected to occur as a result

Problem or priority targeted
What situation you are addressing

1. Meetings

At least 2 in person meetings, geographically located in north Alabama and Birmingham. The target audiences are Green Industry, or urban foresters. 

Changes in the target audience’sability to diagnose the pest and the key life stages of the primary natural enemies of CMBS

 

The target audience will show increased knowledge of the potential impacts of CMBS treatments on non-targets.

 

Increased knowledge of pollinator hazards associated with the use of certain insecticides for CMBS control.  

 

 

·  Increased awareness and confidence in sampling and detection of CMBS. Early detection of infestations or detections of crawler hatches can provide non-insecticidal options for management. 

·  Increase consideration of solutions for CMBS that are not insecticide based. 

·  Identification of natural enemies and the role they play in CMBS management. We have had homeowners and professional stakeholders suggest that larval mealybug destroyers were ‘walking CMBS females’. Addressing this misunderstanding can reduce unneeded insecticide use. 

·  Capacity building and specialized training for REA in AL. Right now, this pest is outbreaking and there are limited amounts of resources available for education and Extension efforts.

At least 2 REA and County personnel trainings held by Zoom with an in-person audience. Train the trainer format provides training on diagnostics, management, the bookmark diagnostic tool, and the research demo. Attendees will be provided the slides used and taught how to use the bookmark in diagnostics. 

2. Develop and deliver Extension materials

Develop the train the trainer powerpoint presentation and supporting handouts.

 

The bookmarks will be made and delivered during our Extension meetings as well as provided to the REA in north and south Alabama that answer questions about CMBS.

 

REA in the most impacted areas will have increased understanding of diagnostics and control options. They will have new resources to train stakeholders in their counties and regions.   

 

Our survey will guide any needed revisions to the training materials.

·      Identification of natural enemies and their role in CMBS management.

 

·      Reduction in ecologicalimpacts on beneficial insects and pollinators associated with current Extension recommendations for CMBS.

·      Engage REA in project through the development and delivery of these tools.

 

Develop a bookmark on identification of CMBS.

 

Evaluation of Extension program through survey instrument.

3. Demonstration research

Demonstration and evaluation of conservation biological control of CMBS in urban landscapes.

·  Evaluate conservation biological control of CMBS management relative to current insecticide recommendations.

·  Provide a student with opportunities for training in STEM and IPM.

·  Provide REA and Green Industry leaders in Alabama the opportunity to participate in and observe use of biological control in urban landscapes.

 

·  A greater ‘willingness to try’ conservation biological control among homeowners and arborists.

·  Is biological control of CMBS a viable alternative to chemical control in urban landscapes?

·  Can we integrate timely use of reduced risk botanical products and attractants for natural enemies?  

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Regional IPM Centers.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

USDA Regional IPM Centers USDA

This site is produced and managed by the Regional IPM Centers and is based on code developed by SARE. The Regional IPM Centers are supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture through agreement 2018-70006-28884. Nondiscrimination Policy. Privacy Policy.

USDA Regional IPM Centers © 2026
Help | Contact us