• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Search Projects
  • Log in

USDA Regional IPM Centers

Grants to support Integrated Pest Management
  • Grants Home
  • Project Reports
    • Search Projects
    • Search Project Coordinators
  • About The IPM Centers

Project Overview

WA039
Project Type: IPM Centers Grant
Funds awarded in 2025: $32,916.00
Grant Recipient: Mast Reforestation
Region: Western
State: Washington
Cooperating States: none
Project Coordinator:
Dr. Lydia Tymon
Email
Mast Reforestation

Advancing seedling health: evaluating chitosan for disease management in forestry nurseries

Reports

Commodities

No commodities identified (required to submit report)

For projects that don't address specific plant and/or animal production, click this button.

Target Pests

No target pests identified (required to submit report)

For projects that don't address specific target pest, click this button.

Practices

No practices identified (required to submit report)

Proposal abstract:

The frequency and intensity of high-severity wildfires in the western U.S. have increased dramatically, creating an unprecedented demand for reforestation seedlings. NOAA predicts a six-fold increase in large wildfire risks by 2050, with serious implications for American forests and related industries. In 2024 alone, wildfires in California impacted over one million acres, with significant losses also recorded in Washington and Oregon. Reforestation efforts are crucial for restoring environmental, ecological, and economic services. Private nurseries, which account for 83% of seedling production in the western U.S. region, play a vital role in this process.

However, nursery seedling production efforts face significant threats from soilborne pathogens such as Fusarium spp., Cylindrocarpon spp.. For example, Cylindrocarpon caused a 74% loss of a Douglas-fir seedling lot at the Silvaseed Company in 2022. Current management options are limited, particularly in bare root nurseries, where only two fungicides are available, Clearys 3336 and Tourney E, to manage Fusarium spp. in Douglas-fir, Z, and Clearys 3336 and Dithane 75 are recommended for the management of Cylindrocarpon spp.based on plate assays. Overuse of these products raises concerns about resistance development. 

Chitosan, a polysaccharide derived from crustacean shells, offers a promising alternative for managing soilborne diseases. Studies demonstrate that chitosan can reduce fungal growth, alter pathogen morphology, and trigger plant defense mechanisms. Applications of chitosan have improved survival rates in forestry seedlings infected by damping-off pathogens and increased drought tolerance. Despite its potential, research on its operational efficacy in conifer nurseries remains limited. 

This project aims to evaluate the efficacy of chitosan (Tidal Vision Spectra) compared to conventional fungicides (Clearys 3336,  Dithane 75, and Tourneys EZ) in managing soilborne diseases in Douglas-fir seedlings in greenhouse and field settings. 

 

Project objectives from proposal:

  1. Compare the inhibitory effects of Clearys 3336, Dithane 75, Tidal Vision Spectra at high and medium concentrations on the growth of Cylindrocarpon and Fusarium spp. with plate assays.
  2. Assess Product Efficacy in Greenhouse Settings 
    1. Quantify the impact of product treatments on disease incidence, severity, and tissue colonization by Cylindrocarpon and Fusarium spp. in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings grown under controlled greenhouse conditions.
    2. Determine product efficacy for mitigating Cylindrocarpon and Fusarium spp. infection on seedlings of different growth stages in controlled greenhouse conditions.
  3. Validate Greenhouse Findings in Field Conditions
    1. Evaluate product efficacy in managing Cylindrocarpon and Fusarium spp. in field trials with disease-free seedlings subjected to inoculated soils.
    2. Compare efficacy of product treatments (Cleary’s 3336, Dithane 75, Tidal Vision Spectra) in multiple field environments to account for variability in soil environmental conditions (temperature, structure, total naturally occurring population).
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Regional IPM Centers.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

USDA Regional IPM Centers USDA

This site is produced and managed by the Regional IPM Centers and is based on code developed by SARE. The Regional IPM Centers are supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture through agreement 2018-70006-28884. Nondiscrimination Policy. Privacy Policy.

USDA Regional IPM Centers © 2026
Help | Contact us